The Theme of Hunger and Poverty Portrayed with Social Cultural Economic Clash in Kamala Markandaya’s A Handful of Rice.
The Theme of Hunger and Poverty
Portrayed with Social Cultural Economic clash in Kamalamarkandaya’s A Handful of Rice.
C.KanagaSudha M.A.,M.Phil.
Assistant
Professor, Dept. OF English
ArumugamPillaiSeethaiAmmal
College
Tiruppattur
A Handful of Rice
portrays the socio-cultural economic clash more vividly than the previous
novels. Ravi had left his home in the
village to seek a better existence in the city and is torn between both values
and undergoes a crisis in character.
Once again Markandaya gives a graphic description of an Indian Village
where its people “lived between bouts of genteel and acute poverty – the kind
in which the weakest went to the wall, the old ones and the babies dying of
tuberculosis, dysentery, the ‘falling fever’, ‘recurrent fever’ and any other
names for what was basically, simply nothing but starvation. “Ravi like his
brothers is given some learning by a father who believes that “better things
than were due to a man who could read and write, better things than working with
his hands for a pittance, things for instance like working in a government
office for one hundred rupees per month and a pension when he retired”. But in the city there was no job for them
between coolie and clerk so that it was like a jungle of riff-raffs hanging
around all day doing nothing. And the
father who had craved to have sons who would help him work in the fields is
left to tend them himself. He must
mortgage portions of the fields to meet any contingency as he does before
making a trip to the city of finalize Ravi’s marriage.
In
the city, Ravi discovers that life for the poor is not different. Economically they are as deprived, toiling
hard for meagre wages; exploited by the rich towns people. The English memsahibs and the Indian ones
haggled over prices. Apu, the old
tailor, into whose house Ravi had forced himself one night in a state of
drunkenness when chased by the police, treats his clients as little gods. He works hard to please them, bribes their
watchmen to be allowed into those big houses with marble floors and cool
interiors, is made to use the backstairs like sweepers but he does not
complain. Neither does his daughter
Nalini, whom Ravi loves and marries. She
believes that people of their kind cannot hope to be so rich. But Ravi rebels against such economic
disparity. He knows that the rich belong
to the same class the world over “ “the sameness makes them stick
together.” It was economic stability that
made them use that commanding tone. It
was their money that brought them the power to do the pushing around. The Memsahib who had a lot of clothes
stitched in India because “things were so cheap here…. Knew she would never be
able to afford so many clothes once she left India.” She had no sympathy for the workman who made
this possible. On Apu’s death when
Ravitakes over his work and explains the delay in the delivery, she is not
prepared to accept his reasons for the delay.
Ravi reflects on her callousness “ “Did this woman realize how they
lived? The duties and ceremonies that fell upon the head of the house? In her
community, he wondered, did they simply carry straight on after a death as if
nothing happened?” He felt convinced
that “nothing lays down they should always have the best and trample over us
and do us down and we should always come off worst”. The town was associated with such evils that
were considered a western impact.
Socially
and culturally the tailor Apu has not been changed by the town. He had hoped for a son like any farmer in the
village to help him with his trade. His
home in the city is full of relatives who do not work and live off him. Apu does not complain and never thinks of
“booting out” any relative. But to the
rebel Ravi, in his degenerated phase when all that matters is money, these
relatives are parasites and he shows them the door. He soon realizes the advantage of the old
system but only after much harm is done.
In the initial stages Ravi had seen some of the advantages in the system
when he began to fall in love with Apu’s young daughter Nalini. Marriages in India are not founded on love,
as Jayamma’s showed. She was much
younger than Apu and did not love him.
But in his illness she nursed him “devotedly as a wife should out of a
strong sense of duty.” In the village “Young men came to know young girls
within the approving carefully conducted circle of mutual friends and family
relationships”. A strict watch was kept
on the girls unlike the shameless ways of Europeans and Americans. Women had information on girls who came of
age and boys looking for brides went back and forth to arrange marriages. The living together of all the members had
advantages; you were never left stranded.
Ravi, when he forsakes this, finds himself alone, desperate, unhappy, “a
fish out of water”. He has an incestuous
relationship with his mother-in-law, beats his wife Nalini whom he had loved
dearly. But “who cares what goes on
between four walls? It’s the public scandal that breaks one in two?” The author
comments on the sham and hypocrisy of social values. Once Ravi’s intrinsic innocence is lost he
becomes one of the jungle, that is, the city, at whose feet all the evils have
been dumped.
The
novel mainly deals with the themes of poverty and hunger. Poverty is the keynote of Indian village
life.
Most of the people in Indian
villages are poor as the villages do not offer any opportunity to the people to
earn a better livelihood. Most of the
villagers are the victims of poverty.
They can only think about how to earn bread and butter. Education, good health and entertainment are
only dreams to them. Their old ones and
babies are dying of tuberculosis, dysentery and the recurrent fever. People in villages live below poverty
line. “He (Ravi) knew better the
economics of village life, knew the superhuman efforts, the begging and the
borrowing that went into raising the train fare, the money for the extras
demanded by pride and the standard of a city.
His father had managed it once, where many men like him never managed it
at all”.
Coming
to the city, Ravi is disillusioned that for a poor man there is no difference
between a city and a village. An
illiterate or under educated villager is only suitable for manual labour. Here also he is exploited. Ravi and Apu get 80 rupees for one dozen jackets
while the shop-owners sell one jacket for 125 rupees. Knowing this fact, Ravi loses his temper, “he
and his like perennially scratching around for a living, while they sat still
and waxed fat on huge peremptory margins.” Ravi has to give up all his
ambitions. His dreams never come
true. After Apu’s death his economic
condition worsens. Apu and Ravi’s son
Raju die because they are not properly cured for want of money. Finally, we find the hero struggling for a
handful of rice.
Poverty
gives birth to hunger and starvation. At
the very outset of the novel when we introduced the hero, he is very
hungry. He goes to Apu’s house and says
that he is very hungry. He wants a
meal. He is on the verge of
starvation. Fruits are rarity for Ravi
and Apu’s family. Ravi’s friend
Damodar’s stomach is ‘lean and curved inward.”
All he wants is a meal. After
Apu’s death, Ravi has to sell many things from the house just to satisfy his
and his family’s hunger. Just to satisfy
his hunger he leaves his village, comes to the city and is involved in petty
criminal activities. Afterwards he works
very hard in Apu’s house, first as his assistant and later as his
successor. In spite of hard work he is
unable to live a better life. His dreams
always remain dreams.
Bibliography
Primary Source
Markandaya, Kamala, A Handful of Rice, Orient Paperbacks,
New Delhi, 1966. Print
Secondary Sources
Geeta,
P KamalaMarkandaya : A
Interpretation, Common Wealth Quarterly ;
Vol.3 No.9, 1978, PP 101-102
Print.
Iyenger, K.R.S. Indian Writing in English, Asia Publishing House, 1962. Print.
Jha, Rekha, The Novels of Kamala Markandaya, Prestige Books: Patel Nagar, New Delhi, 1990, Print.
No comments: