World Literature in Translation- 23BEN4C1 Unit II, Lesson 6: Jean Arasanayagam - "Two Dead Soldiers"

 World Literature in Translation- 23BEN4C1

Unit II, Lesson 6: Jean Arasanayagam - "Two Dead Soldiers"

________________________________________

Overview of "Two Dead Soldiers"

Jean Arasanayagam’s poem Two Dead Soldiers reflects on the senselessness of war and the shared humanity that unites people beyond political and cultural divisions. Arasanayagam, a Sri Lankan poet, often explores themes of conflict, identity, and human suffering. In Two Dead Soldiers, she portrays two fallen soldiers, emphasizing their similarities despite being on opposing sides. Through vivid imagery and a somber tone, the poem mourns the loss of life and questions the purpose of war, suggesting that in death, the soldiers are unified by the shared tragedy of their fate.

________________________________________

Original Poetic Lines with Explanation

________________________________________

Original Lines:

They lie together now, face to face,

no longer enemies, no longer on opposing sides.

Explanation:

The opening lines introduce the central image of two dead soldiers lying side by side. In death, their identities as enemies disappear, highlighting the futility of war. The phrase “no longer on opposing sides” suggests that the divisions created by war are artificial and irrelevant in the face of mortality.

________________________________________

Original Lines:

Their uniforms, once proud symbols,

now just cloth on cold bodies.

Explanation:

Arasanayagam points out how the soldiers' uniforms, which once represented pride, nationality, and allegiance, have lost their significance. They are now merely fabric on lifeless bodies, underscoring the emptiness of symbols that once justified the conflict.

________________________________________

Original Lines:

Their blood mingles in the earth,

red rivers flowing into one stream.

Explanation:

This line uses the metaphor of “red rivers” to illustrate how, in death, the soldiers’ blood unites as it mingles with the earth. This image symbolizes the shared humanity of all people, suggesting that bloodshed ultimately serves no purpose and only returns to the earth, indifferent to human divisions.

________________________________________

Original Lines:

No one to claim them, no victory here,

only the silence of a final rest.

Explanation:

In this stanza, Arasanayagam emphasizes the absence of honor or victory in their deaths. With “no one to claim them,” the soldiers are left as forgotten victims of war, their sacrifices ultimately unacknowledged. The silence symbolizes the finality of death and the emptiness left behind, challenging the notion of glory in war.

________________________________________

Original Lines:

Their graves are the same, anonymous,

unmarked by victories or defeats.

Explanation:

The soldiers’ graves are described as “anonymous” and “unmarked,” reinforcing the idea that death erases distinctions of victory or defeat. This anonymity reflects the universal loss and questions the purpose of the soldiers’ lives being sacrificed for war.

________________________________________

Original Lines:

In death, they are brothers,

beyond flags, beyond borders.

Explanation:

Arasanayagam closes the poem by depicting the soldiers as “brothers” in death, united beyond any national or political boundaries. The phrase “beyond flags, beyond borders” suggests that human connection transcends artificial divisions, reminding readers of the common humanity that war often obscures.

________________________________________

Two-Mark Questions with Answers

1. What is the main theme of "Two Dead Soldiers"?

The main theme is the futility of war and the shared humanity that unites people beyond political and cultural divisions.

2. What does the phrase “face to face” suggest in the poem?

It suggests that the soldiers, once enemies, are now equal in death, with no opposition between them.

3. How does Arasanayagam portray the soldiers’ uniforms?

She portrays the uniforms as meaningless in death, emphasizing that they are now just “cloth on cold bodies.”

4. What does the mingling of blood symbolize?

The mingling of blood symbolizes the shared humanity of the soldiers and the futility of their sacrifice.

5. What does “no victory here” imply about the soldiers’ deaths?

It implies that their deaths offer no triumph or gain, only a somber silence and loss.

6. Why are the soldiers’ graves described as “anonymous”?

Their graves are anonymous to show that, in death, distinctions like victories or defeats lose meaning.

7. How does Arasanayagam depict the finality of death in the poem?

She uses the silence of “final rest” and “anonymous graves” to convey the finality and emptiness of death.

8. What does “beyond flags, beyond borders” mean?

It suggests that in death, national and political differences are meaningless, highlighting shared humanity.

9. What does the poet imply by describing the soldiers as “brothers” in death?

By calling them “brothers,” Arasanayagam suggests that all people are united in humanity, even those on opposing sides.

10. What tone does Arasanayagam use in "Two Dead Soldiers"?

The tone is somber and reflective, mourning the senselessness of war and the loss of life.

________________________________________

Five-Mark Questions with Answers

1. Discuss the theme of futility in war as portrayed in "Two Dead Soldiers."

In "Two Dead Soldiers," Arasanayagam emphasizes the futility of war by showing that, in death, the soldiers lose all distinctions of enemy and ally. Their uniforms, once symbols of pride, become meaningless in the face of mortality. The mingling of their blood and the silence of their final rest underscore that war achieves nothing but loss, rendering their sacrifices purposeless and challenging the notion of glory in warfare.

2. How does Arasanayagam use imagery to convey shared humanity in the poem?

Arasanayagam uses vivid imagery such as “red rivers flowing into one stream” and “face to face” to convey shared humanity. By illustrating the mingling of blood and the proximity of the soldiers in death, she suggests that their similarities outweigh their differences. This imagery reinforces the idea that, despite being enemies, they are ultimately united in life and death.

3. Explain the significance of the phrase “no longer on opposing sides” in the poem.

The phrase “no longer on opposing sides” highlights the artificiality of divisions created by war. In death, the soldiers’ identities as enemies vanish, showing that these divisions are irrelevant and trivial compared to the universal reality of mortality. This line emphasizes the irony of war, where individuals fight for causes that, in the end, hold no true meaning.

4. How does the poem reflect on the impact of nationalism?

By presenting the soldiers as “brothers” beyond “flags” and “borders,” Arasanayagam critiques nationalism as a divisive force that leads to unnecessary conflict. The poem suggests that national pride and allegiance are meaningless in death, where all individuals share a common fate. Arasanayagam’s portrayal implies that nationalism can blind people to their shared humanity, leading to pointless sacrifices.

5. Analyze the tone of "Two Dead Soldiers" and its effect on the reader.

The tone of the poem is somber and reflective, encouraging the reader to question the purpose of war and the cost of human lives. Arasanayagam’s tone evokes sympathy and a sense of mourning for the soldiers, who are depicted not as heroes or enemies but as tragic victims of a larger conflict. This tone creates a powerful emotional impact, leading readers to reflect on the futility of war.

________________________________________

Essay Question with Detailed Answer

Question: Examine the themes of shared humanity, nationalism, and the futility of war in Jean Arasanayagam’s Two Dead Soldiers.

Introduction

Jean Arasanayagam’s poem Two Dead Soldiers explores the senselessness of war and the shared humanity that unites people beyond national and political boundaries. Through the image of two fallen soldiers lying together in death, Arasanayagam critiques the artificial divisions created by nationalism and reveals the emptiness of war. Her use of vivid imagery and a reflective tone underscores the idea that, in the end, all people are united by a common humanity.

Subtitles and Explanations

1. Shared Humanity Beyond Conflict

The soldiers, once enemies, lie “face to face” in death, symbolizing the unity of all people beyond the roles assigned by war. Arasanayagam emphasizes that human connection transcends artificial divisions, suggesting that the soldiers are ultimately bound by a shared fate.

2. The Emptiness of Symbols in Death

The poem highlights the meaningless nature of uniforms and symbols in death. Once a source of pride, the uniforms become “just cloth on cold bodies,” symbolizing how war’s symbols lose significance when lives are lost.

3. The Futility of War

Arasanayagam presents war as a futile endeavor, with the soldiers’ deaths offering “no victory.” By describing their graves as “anonymous,” she questions the purpose of war, portraying it as an exercise in senseless sacrifice.

4. Nationalism as a Divisive Force

The reference to “flags” and “borders” critiques nationalism as a source of conflict. In death, these divisions are revealed as inconsequential, suggesting that nationalism often blinds individuals to their common humanity.

5. Imagery of Blood and Unity

The image of “blood mingling” serves as a powerful reminder of shared humanity. By using the

metaphor of red rivers flowing together, Arasanayagam suggests that, in the end, all people are united by life and death, regardless of their differences.

6. Symbolism of Silence and Final Rest

The silence that surrounds the soldiers’ final rest emphasizes the emptiness left by war. Arasanayagam uses silence to symbolize the futility of their sacrifices, contrasting with the once-loud cries of conflict.

7. The Critique of Heroism in War

By depicting the soldiers’ deaths as anonymous, Arasanayagam challenges the notion of heroism in war. Their sacrifice is shown as tragic rather than noble, suggesting that the concept of heroic sacrifice is often a myth perpetuated by society.

8. The Power of Mortality to Unite

Arasanayagam’s portrayal of death as a unifier reflects the inevitability of mortality. Death erases superficial divisions, reminding readers of the universal reality that all people share.

9. A Reflection on the Cost of War

Through the soldiers’ silent, unclaimed bodies, Arasanayagam forces the reader to consider the cost of war. The image of unclaimed bodies suggests a loss that is neither acknowledged nor justified, questioning the true cost of conflict.

10. Arasanayagam’s Call for Peace and Unity

Ultimately, the poem conveys a desire for peace and unity, urging readers to recognize the artificial nature of divisions. Arasanayagam’s message is a call for a world that values human life over political and national allegiances.

Conclusion

In Two Dead Soldiers, Jean Arasanayagam poignantly critiques the futility of war and the artificial divisions created by nationalism. Through vivid imagery and a reflective tone, she conveys the shared humanity that unites all people. Her message challenges readers to look beyond divisions and to value life over conflict, suggesting that in death, we are all equal and united.