Psychological Approach
Literary
influences on Freud:
•Freud
was not the first to talk about the workings of the psyche. The romantics, both
English and European, had earlier delved into the workings of th emind. Diderot’s Rameaus’
Nephew influenced Freud
deeply. In this work, Rameaus’ nephew stands for
the irrational element in human nature which Freud later called id.
•Diderot
represents the reason that controls impulses. Freud calls this reasoning
faculty the ego, and
the super
ego. Rousseu’s Confessions
is another work that
deeply influenced Freud, as it opened his eyes to the immortal self that lies
hidden in the depths of even a good man.
•The
concept of free love was aired by Shelley and Byron in England and by Schlegel,
Schopenhauer and Stendhal in Europe.
This concept
strengthened Freud’s concept of the libidinous id struggling against the rational ego
and superego.Literary influences on Freud:
•Freud
was not the first to talk about the workings of the psyche. The romantics, both
English and European, had earlier delved into the workings of th emind. Diderot’s Rameaus’
Nephew influenced Freud
deeply. In this work, Rameaus’ nephew stands for
the irrational element in human nature which Freud later called id.
•Diderot
represents the reason that controls impulses. Freud calls this reasoning
faculty the ego, and
the super
ego. Rousseu’s Confessions
is another work that
deeply influenced Freud, as it opened his eyes to the immortal self that lies
hidden in the depths of even a good man.
•The
concept of free love was aired by Shelley and Byron in England and by Schlegel,
Schopenhauer and Stendhal in Europe.
This concept
strengthened Freud’s concept of the libidinous id struggling against the rational ego
and superego.
The Influence of Freud on Literary Criticism:
•Freud has affected
literary criticism in three ways:
•First, psychological
terms are being increasingly used in literary criticism. Conrad Aiken’s Skepticism:
Notes on Contemporary Poetry and Herbert Read’s Reason and Romanticism, are marked by an
excess of psychological terms. These early critics used psychologial tools
indiscriminately and injudiciously.
•They tried to trace
erotic motives and meanings in all literary works under the sun. As years
passed by, this initial enthusiasm subsided and the light cast by psychology on
literature began to appear more substantial.
•Based on psychology
in general and Freudian findings in particular, many perceptive studies of the
creative process began to appear.
•I.A. Richards’s Principles
of Literary Criticism paved
the way for such studies. I.A. Richards analysed the constituents of aesthetic experience. He said hat gret literature
contributed to ‘synaesthetic equilibrium’ and
evoked ‘a harmonious kind of response’ from the audience. Following him, Ogden
and Wood published the Foundations of Aesthetics. In his essay Antony in Behalf of the Play, Kenneth Burke
examines the unconscious relation between the writer and the reader.
•The
second contribution made by Freudian psychology is that psychoanalysts psychoanalyse creative authors in
an effort to find out how the maladjustments of the authors colour their works. The
following is a list of such psychological biographies – i) Sir Harold
Nicolson’s Tennyson:
Aspects of his life, Character and poetry.
ii) Joseph Wood
Krutch’s Edgar
Allan Poe: A Study in Genius, John Middleton Murry’s The Son of Woman: The Story of D.H.Lawrence, etc.,
•The
third contribution made by Freud is that psychology is being increasingly used
to explain fictitious characters. The critic becomes a psychoanalyst, searching
for subconscious forces which motivate a character. A classic example of such
psychoanalysis is Ernest Jones’s study of Hamlet in which he attributes Hamlet’s delay in avenging his
father’s death to his (Hamlet’s) mother-fixation or oedipal complex. Following
this study, Ernest Kris wrote a psychological study of Prince Hal’s conflict,
identifying Hotspur with super ego and Falstaff with Id.
•Following
Freud, Adler with his concept of the inferiority complex and Jung, with his
theory of the collective unconscious, enriched the psychoogist’s armoury. Yet, many charges
were levelled against the
psychological approach. One that is psychologists mistake poets for dreamers.
The dreamer has no control over his dream but the poet has control over his
product.
•The
overenthusiasm of some Freudian
critics who scent erotic motives behind every character is certainly
questionable.
No comments: